|
|
|
|
The Palace and the Bunker |
![]() |
|
In
the late 1970s, my very first batch of cinema students said to me, on their
very last day at university: ‘In 25 years time, somewhere on this planet, we’ll
be sitting in some movie theatre, and we’ll hear some guy laughing his head
off, up the back. Then we’ll know to turn around and exclaim: “Hi, Adrian!”’
The
Palace or the Bunker: these are the two extremes of my moviegoing life. The big-screen experience, as Hollywood likes to fetishise it, at the one end of the continuum; and, at the other end, the makeshift
sheet-on-a-wall in some basement. I cannot rightly say that, for me, either is
more meaningful or intense than the other; both carry a specific thrill.
I
associate the grandest Picture Palaces of my life not only with the nostalgia
of childhood in the 1960s – places like the Forum in Melbourne where I saw, in
complete, dazzled bewilderment, the likes of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) or Fantastic Voyage (1966) – but also adult travels to film festivals in (to me) exotic
places like Vienna or Amsterdam.
Watching
Olivier Assayas’ Irma Vep (1996) or the restored version of Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil (1958) on the
huge Pathé screen at the Rotterdam Film Festival in
the late 1990s was like swimming right into a vast, uncontrollable vortex of
images and sounds. Immersion, escape, ecstasy: everything the multi-million
dollar blockbusters want to give us (but so rarely achieve), I found them on
the Festival circuit discovering breathtaking films by Claire Denis or Youssef Chahine.
Very
early one morning in Brisbane – this, too, was an exotic city for me – the
Director of the Festival there allowed me to have a private screening, at the
dawn of the 21st century. In a near-empty cinema of the city’s most
eminent Picture Palace, I watched Tsai Ming-liang’s What Time Is It There? unfold for me, just for me. The film was great, but my privileged situation made it
greater.
The
Picture Palace is never only a matter of ornate decoration and sweeping
architecture, staircases and levels, grand projector beam ‘throw’ and Dolby
Stereo sound. Almost anywhere big enough and dark enough can fill this bill –
particularly if the screen itself is large enough, and/or I am seated close enough to it.
In
times of intense insecurity and loneliness – such as having just moved to a new
city to live – I hug these cinema spaces. Such as the Chauvel in Sydney in the mid 1980s, screening fractured Orson Welles epics and raw New
York No Wave independents. I believe I joined the editorial group of the
magazine Filmnews then because its office was right next to the cinema, and I could transit ever
more easily from writing about film to viewing it, spending as little time as
possible in my tiny, cold share-house room.
The
Bunker, unlike the Palace, resists generic description. Each time, it is always
new, always specific. Sometimes, it is simply the video monitor in the corner
space of a film distribution office, or a cultural events group headquarters –
but in these unassuming corners, I have viewed many of the greatest avant-garde
films in cinema history, from Werner Nekes to Chantal Akerman.
The
Bunker can also be a backyard garage, a church hall, an uncomfortable
classroom, an after-hours library, an abandoned warehouse, someone’s lounge
room (where I saw Robert Bresson’s Au hasard, Balthazar! on 16 millimetre) – or even a sterile, government-funded art gallery,
especially when customised by some renegade film-culture cabal. Another shot of
tropical Brisbane: crammed in with a hundred sweaty, young bodies to watch a rare
celluloid projection of Carolee Schneemann’s Fuses (1967), the whole room seemed
to haze over in a timeless, collective delirium.
In
between the Palace and the Bunker: the Drive-In. This was a rarity in my
childhood and teen years; I must have been taken there less than half a dozen
times, since it was a largely ‘outer suburbs’ phenomenon and I was an
inner-city kid. But every detail of these trips – the audio speakers, the gooey
half-time refreshments, the sometimes noisy and violent crowds (occasionally
erupting from their cars), the drive there and back – is etched in my memory.
Not to mention the super-weird films, like Zachariah (‘the first electric Western’, duelling guitars replacing guns) or The Case of the Smiling Stiffs (don’t
ask). When some smarty-pants curator, in the twilight moments of the Drive-In
phenomenon, tried to stage an art event in one such spot, the local audience
revolted, assembled, and rocked the projection booth back and forth. A fitting swan song for proletarian moviegoing.
Something
a little more specific to a film critic’s life: the Hotel Room. Where, during a
Film Festival, you might be allowed to watch (or stream) the ‘screeners’, or
you download the files for later use. No longer the Big
Screen, only the TV screen, or the laptop. Avoiding the crowd, eschewing
the spectacle, ignoring your fellow professionals: true chamber cinema, cinema
in the boudoir, allowing other, more corporeal pleasures to be mixed in …
And
finally, the strange Little Cinemas, with their very particular, regular
sessions: kids and young teenagers packed into every available inch of a small
Parisian theatre, one afternoon, to watch (of all things) Emir Kusturica’s Arizona
Dream (1993) – swooning each time Johnny Depp appeared, but roaring their applause whenever Jerry Lewis entered the frame. Or
the pokey, disarming place in Vienna that showed mainly Goldie Hawn comedies of
the 1970s to a crowd of faithful, very elderly patrons: the natural odour of
this place, arising from the accumulation of bodies, was such that (I’m not
kidding) at half time, an usherette would walk imperiously down the aisle
spraying air freshener.
The
Ritz Cinema, running in a handily equipped room of the North Melbourne Town
Hall council building during the 1970s and ‘80s, was a special combination of
Palace, Bunker, Little Cinema – and subcultural habitus. There were sessions where – having bought my
ticket from the learned cinephile in the closet-like booth
and collected the Roneod one-sheet of microscopically
typed program notes – I feared for my physical safety, and never more so than
the time that Kenneth Anger’s Scorpio
Rising (1963) was projected. There were mild-mannered cinephiles (like me), queer film fans, connoisseurs of experimental and underground arts
in attendance, naturally – as well as contingents from two opposing biker
gangs, who each took up seats on one side of the theatre, and proceeded to
snarl at each other before, during and after the film (and what on earth did
they make of what they were seeing and hearing?).
One
more: a Little Cinema – this time, of the type that sprang into existence as
veritable afterthoughts after the rest of a Multiplex had been built – in Las
Palmas on the Canary Islands, during a film festival near the end of the 2000s.
I am watching a 1960s, black-and-white documentary about radical psychiatry and
communal living. There is only one other person in the cinema, and he chooses
to sit not far along from me: he is clearly a homeless ‘bag man’, stinking to high heaven, and he fills several neighbouring seats with his
plastically-wrapped belongings. How did he find his way to this movie? His
relation to its scenes is particular, and systematic: each time we see the
clinic’s patients running or dancing, this spectator leaps out of his seat, hurls
himself around, yelps with delight, and keeps looking over at me as if to say:
‘Great, isn’t it?’ And whenever a doctor or some other bespectacled authority
figure appears, he slumps in his seat, cups two hands around his mouth, and
begins to make a low noise, growing louder: ‘Boo! BOO!’
The
thing about cinema is: it welcomes us all.
© Adrian Martin 29 August 2014 |
![]()