|
Le départ
|
Unglued
More and more we are
assailed by the feeling: our youth is but a brief night (fill it with rapture!);
it will be followed by grand “experience”, the years of compromise,
impoverishment of ideas, and lack of energy. Such is life. That is what adults
tell us, and it is what they experienced (...) But [the philistine] has never
grasped that there exists something other than experience, and that there are
values – inexperienceable – which we serve.
– Walter Benjamin, 1913, age 18
Youth is better left
unexplained. Just think: what are the most memorable elements in any youth or
JD [juvenile delinquent] film? Their capacity for outlining the social dilemma
of youth? No! It’s all the sex, swearing, violence and action – those bits
where youth is at its most reckless and disconnected from social and family
ties. Youth these days is so grown-up it’s painful!
– Philip Brophy, 1988,
age 29
You know the cinephile game that consists of
proclaiming, ridiculously but passionately: “Cinema is Rio Bravo, is Le Mépris,
is Viaggio in Italia, is Gertrud, is Eyes Wide Shut”… ? Well, now I, too, can play the game, because
cinema for me is, categorically, Jerzy Skolimowski’s Le départ.
John
Cale writes about a wild time of his life in his autobiography What’s Welsh for Zen?: “This was
something close to cinema. A vicarious, unstable reality”. For me, the
vicarious, unstable reality of cinema is concentrated in Le départ.
Many
believe that the French New Wave died in 1964. But the ultimate Nouvelle Vague
film was made in 1967 by a Polish director – who couldn’t speak a word of
French – in Belgium! How can this extraordinary film count for so little in
the annals of post-Nouvelle Vague film history, when it should figure as one of
the great culminations of ‘60s cinema? (It does, or did once, happen to be
Louis Garrel’s favourite film, as I learnt from some stray fashion magazine.)
Long out of circulation, it finally became available on DVD from Malavida Films
(France) in 2012.
It is cinema in so many ways: as a city film (about
Brussels, hypnotic in all its aspects); as the portrait of a singular young
star (Jean-Pierre Léaud) at the paroxysmic height of his histrionic, acting-out
verve (and Skolimowski misses no opportunity for a lark, disguise or prank
involving him); as surely among the very finest fusions of image, incident and
sound in the medium’s history.
It’s
a wild, raucous, anarchic testament to youth. Skolimowski – 29
years old in 1967, 3 years out of film school – was himself a disconnected, delinquent
Polish youth, obsessed with physical activities such as boxing. He had
already shot to international prominence as part of a bright gang that included
Roman Polanski and Andrzej Wajda. Before it, an amazing string of his Polish feature
productions: Identification Marks: None (1964), Walkover (1965), Barrier (1966). For Le départ, he borrowed two central actors from Jean-Luc Godard’s Masculin féminin (1965): Catherine Duport (as Michèle) –
never to be seen again on screen – and the already iconic Léaud (as Marc),
still playing his emblematic self today.
In the mirror of his maker, Marc is given no family
ties, no job that he truly cares about, no “home” in any genuine sense. He
displays an insouciant disrespect for all elders. For Skolimowski, cinema shares in the energy of his
confused and immature rebel-heroes. This savage youth is a state that is hard
to leave (and many subsequent Skolimowski stories, as he himself ages, will
show the difficult passage from sullen son to troubled father.) Marc even
steals food from a baby! And he is always pitted against the animal kingdom,
such as a memorably yapping dog.
For Le départ, Skolimowski also borrowed
from the ambient Pop Art culture of the ‘60s: a world of media images on
screens and posters, consumerism on billboards. Everywhere, the eyes of images look
at us … (later to become a paranoid fixation of Jacques Rivette – or his
characters, at any rate – in Pont du Nord [1981]).
But it's also a romantic comedy, and right up there
with It Happened One Night (1934) on
this plane: from overnight-in-car-boot to hesitant bedroom glances, and the
morning of the big race that finds him still there in bed with her – it has the
ardent brio (and nervous candour) which the Nouvelle Vague itself rarely if
ever achieved, not even in Truffaut (sedate compared to Skolimowski). And what
a modern sense of humour: sudden stasis (paralysis) broken by shouts and mad
flailing, immediate contradictions (this Porsche freak is a hairdresser by day?),
scenes whisked away with nary a backward glance.
Le départ is a film
I would gladly live in.
The
content is apolitical, but the style is totally free. Nothing comes close to it
for intensity: the speed (of cars); the music (by Krzysztof Komeda – who died
tragically young at 38 in 1969 – with solo sax by Gato Barbieri); the manic
gesticulations (by Léaud at his craziest and most physical: see his foundational gesture of running, or his jumping of fences and gates); the
energy and élan of the editing and camera movements; and the often destructive, anarchic use of sets and props. (Léaud continued the
game with Skolimowski in their subsequent episode of the conceptual anthology Dialog: 20/40/60 [1968]).
Le départ has an
improvisatory, make-believe nature. Everything that happens in it is being constantly
rebooted, via sudden, wayward story developments. That amazing music truly drives the film – to an
extent rarely seen in cinema – with its stop/start rhythms, its noisy
discordance, its dreaminess. Entire, complicated passages (bridging many scene
and location changes) seem shaped around the dynamics of large cues in this
score.
It
is a freewheeling comedy of masquerade (Léaud dubbing
himself in mock-Indian is a highlight – in fact, the whole film is, I think, post-sync,
like a heavy-breathing porno). There’s a constant play with the customised
image that any person can become – by, for instance, putting on a wig. In Le départ, characters literally do transform into images by the end: still
images on the film-strip …
But
I don’t want to live in it (to be one
of the characters, or anything like that); I don’t want to be some imaginary
person walking around in that fictive world, having those exact adventures. I want
to live on it, on its filmic
surfaces, in the cracks of its cuts, flying atop the music.
Skolimowski
plunges us into pure, lawless, cinema-driven fantasy, as well as the sudden
limit of that fantasy. When the inhibited hero finally reaches his emotional release,
when he switches from beloved car-object to a real, live girl that he even has
sex with, that’s when everything crumbles: the film breaks and it burns. The
images that people have become, that they have transformed themselves into, are
vulnerable, perishable. The breakthrough is a breakdown, as psychoanalyst Wilfred
Bion feared and predicted of his patients: the supposed moment of clarity
cannot last, in fact it brings greater anguish, and an immediate need to close
it all up, defend one’s self once more. To glue back up what has become fatally
unglued at the very moment of liberation.
So
I, inside it or on top of this film, burn with it, too.
Quite
literally, I had a vivid dream about Le
départ on a morning in 2013 when I was due to give a lecture about it, in a
course titled “Entertainment, Spectacle and Showbiz”. This was what the dream, in
its analytic flash, told me to say (I had not consciously thought any of it
beforehand) – and I said it, but without telling the student-body of the
oneiric origin, by riffing on the following Powerpoint statements hastily
transcribed from my unconscious:
People become images.
Images enter a market, and
become commodities. Commodities
can be exchanged – bought or
sold – in the consumer market,
according to the value (price)
affixed to them. This is how people become living objects in Guy Debord’s society
of spectacle, or Jean Baudrillard’s system of objects.
Commodity value is
always unnatural, artificial, inflated or deflated according to ever-changing
market demand, and fashions in consumer taste (e.g., prices of artworks).
Natural humanity enters an unnatural cycle.
The film shows an
endless quest to trade things for money: art, a mirror, a bike … Marc’s
hairdressing job clues him as to the mad value of real hair for fake wigs. He even
considers, for a while, taking up the life of a gigolo and servicing rich,
older women (the grotesque side of sexuality in Skolimowski, cf. Diana Dors in
the baths change-room in Deep End [1970]).
Like other young
heroes in Skolimowski films, the central figure here is both obsessed with a physical/skill goal (to win at car racing), and struggling
to survive in a harsh economy. He is both a moral and amoral figure.
The question such heroes face is: what
can they sell or exchange – or what
are they willing to sell (including themselves) – if they stop short of outright
thievery? The individual’s only recourse is to play the system: buy, sell, lie, cheat, “talk-up” value, etc.
Youth has this energy!
Like many films of
‘60s and since, the goal is not
satisfied, and reaches a strange conclusion: the usual heroic quest or journey narrative is diverted (by love, life, self-realisation,
breakdown, error …)
The drama/crisis of “growing up” for the youth
rebel – growing up into what? On the one hand, Marc (Léaud) here is patently
immature/adolescent. A difficult choice: to conform (“play the game”), or to continue the rebellion/resistance of youth. Is growing up an act
of betraying one’s idealism, selling
out (note the resonance of these words in the film’s “market
economy”)?
To leave the
static/suspended moment of liminality is a crisis of dissolution for a fragile
self: hence the enigmatic, ambiguous ending of Le départ. The film has traced the path from an interruption or deviation in a conscious life-plan (Marc’s dazed look of love); to the
birth of a Neo-Romantic anti-hero – romantic but highly immature; to the
emergence of Michèle as the object and the subject of desire: she who
always knows more … and, in an immortal scene set to Christiane Legrand (Michel
Legrand’s sister, her voice was previously used for Umbrellas of Cherbourg)
singing the film’s theme, not so easily impressed by all the boy/car antics.
In fact, Duport as Michèle is the sublime Nouvelle Vague Heroine in all
her everyday states, beyond anything we get in French cinema of just before
that time (later, things change a bit, with the emergence of Nelly Kaplan and
many other directors). What an intro she gets, the descending lift bringing
her into close-up! Women are always smarter than men in Skolimowski. In an inversion of romantic comedy conventions,
the couple gets stuck in the boot of a car. Modern life is a matter of
solitude, separation, “emptiness forever”.
How
many films can prompt, without bidding, such hyper-lucid dreams of delirious
analysis?
Le départ is sheer dynamism, sheer dynamite: although
Skolimowski strikes me as the least cinephilic of directors (in the sense that
filmic quotes and allusions rarely figure here – cars and girls are what really
fire his imagination), his palpable joy in the conjuring, capturing and
configuring of movement, scale, speed (is this, outside of Richard Lester,
among the first films to kick off with an unbridled act of the hero running?),
musical mood (what joy in those lyrical, free moments when post-sync voices and
ambient sounds are dropped altogether! – as in the motorbike ride where Marc
confesses something unhearable to Michèle while that sad, French pop song pours
out) and gradations of light and dark in black-and-white: it’s like watching
the cinema invent itself before your eyes, from silent days right up to now.
Especially in the immortal sequence – Richard Lester meets Philippe Grandrieux – of Marc
and Michèle carrying a mirror and clowning around with it: all the way to the
reverse-footage moment where the mirror breaks and then unbreaks so that the
scene/plot/film can just go on intact! And I’ll be damned if Monte Hellman didn’t get the burning-frame (under the sound of racing cars) ending of Two-Lane Blacktop (1971) straight from Le départ (rather than the artier Persona, which sadly lacked the racing
car element).
This
remarkable “take-off” or “departure” also signalled the beginning of Jerzy Skolimowski’s restless globetrotting as a filmmaker. An
incredible career that includes, among other highlights, Deep End, The Shout (1978), Moonlighting (1982), Four Nights with Anna (2008). He is
still going strong today, hitting 80, as the criminally underrated 11 Seconds (2015) proves. Long may he
run!
© Adrian Martin March-April 2009 / April 2013 / 25 July 2014 2.45pm / 18 June 2017 |